Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluation of a Haptic Interface for In-Vehicle Systems
Chalmers University of Technology.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Business Administration, Technology and Social Sciences, Human Work Science.
2003 (English)In: Ergonomics in the digital age: proceedings of the XVth Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association and The 7th Joint Conference of Ergonomics Society of Korea/Japan Ergonomics Society , August 24-29, 2003, Seoul, Korea, The Ergonomics Society of Korea , 2003Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

By introducing information and communication systems higher demands are put on the human-machine-interface in the vehicle. Concurrently the load on the driver isincreasing especially concerning visual tasks, a sensory channel that from a safety perspective should be used primarily for the demanding on-road situation. Hapticinterfaces present innovative and complementary ways for the driver to communicate with the systems in the vehicle. The objective of this study was to evaluate a hapticinterface, consisting of a haptic device and a graphic display, for in-vehicle-systems. By means of a driving simulator a usability evaluation with thirteen subjects was carried out for a haptic interface and a traditional interface. In sum, it cannot be concluded that neither a haptic interface nor a traditional interface for driver in-vehicle systems is preferable as a rule. Though, it looks as if the former should be considered when the tasks become more complex while the latter is more suitable and faster in relation to simpler tasks. Furthermore, the traditional interface appears to be advantageous from a safety point of view, based on the diversion of gaze from the road. Yet, this result is not conclusive since the haptic interface is regarded as imposing less task-load, being easier to use and understand, and mainly the first choice between the two interfaces. It might be that the haptic interface is experienced as more consistent.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
The Ergonomics Society of Korea , 2003.
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Research subject
Engineering Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-38618Local ID: d0f89e50-2bf1-11dd-8657-000ea68e967bOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-38618DiVA: diva2:1012119
Conference
Triennial Congress of the International Ergonomics Association : 24/08/2003 - 29/08/2003
Note

Godkänd; 2003; 20080527 (andbra)

Available from: 2016-10-03 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Authority records BETA

Bengtsson, Peter

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bengtsson, Peter
By organisation
Human Work Science
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf