Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Alternative assessments in civil and environmental engineering
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Geosciences and Environmental Engineering.
2003 (English)In: Engineering Education for a Sustainable Future: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference for Australasian Association for Engineering Education and 9th Australasian Women in Engineering Forum, Australasian Association for Engineering Education , 2003, p. 211-218Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Examination greatly influences course structure and student study strategies. Three courses for students in the Civil and Environmental Engineering programs at Luleå University of Technology were reconstructed with the aims of making the assessment part of the learning process and to facilitate deep learning. Several different types of assessment were tested. Assessment in the form of a large project and field- and laboratory work was shown to be successful when applied to a course in snow engineering for university students with various backgrounds. A course in hydrology and hydraulics was reconstructed with the aim of assessing increasing levels of understanding. A simple written test was designed to assess lower levels of understanding (definitions, concepts etc.). Laboratory work, fieldwork and extensive assignments (calculation tasks) were intended to assess medium levels of understanding (apply, use and combine algorithms etc). A final oral group exam that was used to assess high levels of understanding (compare/contrast, explain causes, analyse, relate) concluded the course. A course in International Sanitary Engineering was assessed with cross-group presentations and literature seminars. Teaching and assessing features known to encourage deep learning approaches were adopted. Different types of peer assessment were tested with varying degree of success. For all three courses both the students and the teachers reported increased learning with these course structures and assessment strategies than from courses with a final written exams.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Australasian Association for Engineering Education , 2003. p. 211-218
National Category
Geochemistry
Research subject
Applied Geology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-34722Local ID: 90087690-a96f-11dc-9057-000ea68e967bISBN: 0-9750861-0-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-34722DiVA: diva2:1007973
Conference
Annual Australian Association for Engineering Education Conference : 29/09/2003 - 01/10/2003
Note
Godkänd; 2003; 20071213 (mivu)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(270 kB)15 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 270 kBChecksum SHA-512
7a90f50177d61d26f3c8ff35797b7790cd056478b017221085df4df56afd30817d2dce7ae89f70c00c8aaba68b1088e07b449982926542e3a7f581019f509fa2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lundberg, Angela
By organisation
Geosciences and Environmental Engineering
Geochemistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 15 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 28 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf