Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Ski Resorts Who Cried Wolf: Swedish Historical Public Avalanche Information and the Impact of Different Generations of Danger Scales
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Mining and Geotechnical Engineering.
2013 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Are Swedes overrepresented in avalanche accidents due to inflation in public avalanche danger? According to preliminary statistics the Swedish skiers are overrepresented as nationality in avalanche accidents in the Alps. A Swedish skier is almost 40 times more likely to die in an avalanche in the Alps than at home in Sweden. What lies behind this phenomenon? Do the Swedes take greater risks than other nationalities? The author presents a hypothesis that the Swedes accident statistics might be traced back to a disturbance in risk understanding due to faulty public avalanche danger rat- ings. In the mid 90's, the first generation avalanche danger scale was introduced and used in Sweden. Unfortunately it contained large errors, and was based solely on weather conditions. Weather as the only criteria led to danger levels rarely below 3 during a winter regardless of actual avalanche danger. This made the Swedish skiers accustomed to a false high avalanche danger for nearly ten years. The author's hypothesis is that this danger inflation has caused that Swedes to have an offset scale per- ception and therefore more often than other nationalities suffer from avalanche accidents. The paper shows how the published avalanche danger ratings at a couple of larger ski resorts in Sweden are correlated to how the danger scale in use is formulated in two generations of scale design. The author presents an explanation of the importance of correct avalanche information to create an accurate un- derstanding of danger in the population. It also presents theories of how collective risk understanding affect risk behaviour.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2013.
National Category
Geotechnical Engineering
Research subject
Soil Mechanics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-32774Local ID: 75d90a76-9043-41c1-9f5d-4229e35a14ffOAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-32774DiVA: diva2:1006008
Conference
Nordisk konferanse om snøskred og friluftsliv : 01/11/2013 - 03/11/2013
Note
Godkänd; 2013; 20141111 (stemar)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1081 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1081 kBChecksum SHA-512
96dd0cfab71d7eac3d9abefd845d39ce2fa7f20e2e94f51b5f38129b473c220246cb2c6ef504472335d30ba6063b789d52562549def83b647afd484681c6b003
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mårtensson, Stefan
By organisation
Mining and Geotechnical Engineering
Geotechnical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 18 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 13 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf