Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Inflation adjusted LCCA of a comparative study of an Integral abutment bridge and a Concrete bridge with expansion joints
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7286-5500
Universidade de Coimbra.
Luleå tekniska universitet.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-4791-2341
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: Sustainable construction - a life cycle approach in engineering: Proceedings, International Symposium Malta, 23 - 25 July 2010. COST Action C25, 2010, p. 151-161Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Gervasio H. et al [1]in there comparative life cycle analysis of an integral abutment composite bridge and concrete bridge have established the advantages of integral bridge due to its limited initial construction cost and maintenance and repair costs during its life cycle. This paper is based on the same data with a modification to the life cycle cost analysis of the bridge by using an inflation adjusted discount rate. In standard bridge structures, expansion joints are one of the most expensive components to maintain. In this regard, joint less bridge have major advantages. Integral bridges are built without joints, they span from one abutment to the other abutment, possibly over intermediate piers, without any joints in the deck. The absence of joints and bearings results in savings in initial costs and reduce maintenance efforts. Apart from economic benefits, the reduction of maintenance leads to less disturbance of the traffic over the bridge and thus to smaller environmental and social impacts. In this paper a case study is presented with the purpose of making a comparative life cycle analysis between an integral composite bridge and a concrete bridge with expansion joints. The result of this life cycle analysis will enhance the advantages of the former solution in regards to the economic and environmental aspects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. p. 151-161
National Category
Building Technologies
Research subject
Steel Structures
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-29421Local ID: 2e4c105d-b9ae-4e64-8d60-ad91b9f03bbeISBN: 9789993209171 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-29421DiVA, id: diva2:1002645
Conference
COST Action C25 Sustainability of Constructions : Integrated Approach to Life-time Structural Engineering 23/07/2010 - 25/07/2010
Note
Godkänd; 2010; 20121024 (ysko)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2018-06-08Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1047 kB)23 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1047 kBChecksum SHA-512
aac0c7cff1f1932faa8f5254a13294270e7f87c09bcfd01c93e773f2fa8d8c1f1ac8ad90f2136ae858bb7bbd3ab84b5223eb743d236689e3a7d07c02ee529efc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Iqbal, NaveedVeljkovic, Milan
By organisation
Structural and Construction Engineering
Building Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 23 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf