Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The ambiguity of value
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7564-006X
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Civil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Structural and Construction Engineering.
Luleå University of Technology, Department of Arts, Communication and Education, Education, Language, and Teaching.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6252-4000
2010 (English)In: Proceedings IGLC-18: 18th Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction / [ed] Ken Walsh; Thais Alves, Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology , 2010, 42-51 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

'Value' is a central concept in all of the principles and methods applied in Lean Construction, but it is rather difficult to provide a precise definition of the term. The problem lies in the word value itself: its ambiguity and vagueness make theorization difficult. This paper investigates the philosophical concept of value from a Lean Construction perspective. Several elements that contribute to value are considered, including objective elements such as waste reduction, quality, price and functionality, and more subjective elements such as design. The hypothesis of this paper is that the reduction or removal of elements that detract from value, such as waste and costs, is not the only means by which value may be increased. The Sorites paradox is used to form a cohesive perspective on some different meanings of the word ‗value‘. One of the known ‗solutions‘ of the paradox, utilization theory, is then explored through a case study in off-site construction that illustrates how different actors in the construction process view value, and how utility theory can be used to provide a consensus on value that is acceptable. In practice, ‗value‘ is ambiguous because actors generally value different things and these views seldom converge during projects. Our results indicate that the actors involved strive for value individually. Analysis using utility theory allows the actors to establish a shared conceptualization of value, expressed in monetary terms. The work described in this paper aims to improve our understanding of value and of how to design products in construction to improve value for clients of industrialized housing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Haifa: Technion-Israel Institute of Technology , 2010. 42-51 p.
Keyword [en]
Philosophy, Sorites paradox, Value, Applied philosophy, Humanities and religion - History and philosophy subjects
Keyword [sv]
Filosofi, Soritesparadoxen, Värde, Tillämpad filosofi, Humaniora och religionsvetenskap - Historisk-filosofiska ämnen
National Category
Philosophy Building Technologies
Research subject
Philosophy; Timber Structures
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-28020Local ID: 1aaaabb0-51d9-11df-a0f4-000ea68e967bISBN: 978-965-555-495-3 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ltu-28020DiVA: diva2:1001213
Conference
Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction : 14/07/2010 - 16/07/2010
Projects
TräIN
Note
Godkänd; 2010; 20100427 (vikvik)Available from: 2016-09-30 Created: 2016-09-30 Last updated: 2017-11-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(255 kB)23 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 255 kBChecksum SHA-512
7c72445a5d37c0c31bd0c37fb1d755b599087d19c9b95fd1b2607bfe5bce2c8a3eef901d317a886b56d7706636bc0d273cf2b4dfa4ec1fb1f388e177e2a2af3e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

http://www.iglc.net/conferences/IGLC%2018/

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Erikshammar, JarkkoBjörnfot, AndersGardelli, Viktor
By organisation
Structural and Construction EngineeringEducation, Language, and Teaching
PhilosophyBuilding Technologies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 23 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 49 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf