Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
"This is what we did last time". Uncertainty over landscape analysis and its procurement in the Swedish road planning process
Statens väg- och transportforskningsinstitut, Samhälle, miljö och transporter, SAMT, Mobilitet, aktörer och planering, MAP. Lunds Universitet.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-7828-3640
Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet .
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Land use policy, ISSN 0264-8377, E-ISSN 1873-5754, Vol. 42, 48-57 s.Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

In some European countries, landscape analysis has long been used in support of large-scale planning or major projects such as new trunk roads and mainline rail routes, in line with both the UN's Convention on Environmental Impact Assessment and the European Landscape Convention. Some countries, however, lack a regulatory framework for what should be analysed, how a landscape analysis should be conducted, or even how it should be procured. Sweden is one such country.

The research project on which this article is based, uses in-depth interviews with twelve key Swedish officials to consider landscape analysis issues in the planning and procurement of road and railway infrastructure. The findings point to the fact that skilled transport planners are not entirely comfortable with the current situation, and the way landscape analysis is handled in daily planning practice varies enormously. For example, nearly all the respondents believe that the way formal landscape analyses are procured is important, not least to ensure quality, yet at the same time they are rarely commissioned separately, even when this is explicitly stipulated by the regulations. There is no generally accepted notion of what 'landscape' might be, and the terms in which respondents describe the landscape do not correspond to the official landscape terminology as set down in the ELC.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2015. Vol. 42, 48-57 s.
Emneord [en]
Landscape plan, Planning, Land use, Transport infrastructure, Interview, Transport authority, Procurement
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
10 Road: Transport, society, policy and planning
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:vti:diva-9306DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.001ISI: 000347018700006Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84907486257OAI: oai:DiVA.org:vti-9306DiVA: diva2:908621
Tilgjengelig fra: 2016-03-03 Laget: 2016-03-02 Sist oppdatert: 2017-11-30bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Antonson, Hans
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Land use policy

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 71 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf