Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bibliometric analysis of two subdomains in philosophy: free will and sorites
School of Education and Communication in Engineering Sciences (ECE), KTH Royal Institute of Technology, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden..
Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Filosofiska institutionen.
Umeå universitet, Samhällsvetenskapliga fakulteten, Sociologiska institutionen..
Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Filosofiska institutionen.
2015 (Engelska)Ingår i: Scientometrics, ISSN 0138-9130, E-ISSN 1588-2861, Vol. 103, nr 1, s. 47-73Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

In this study we tested the fruitfulness of advanced bibliometric methods for mapping subdomains in philosophy. The development of the number of publications on free will and sorites, the two subdomains treated in the study, over time was studied. We applied the cocitation approach to map the most cited publications, authors and journals, and we mapped frequently occurring terms, using a term co-occurrence approach. Both subdomains show a strong increase of publications in Web of Science. When we decomposed the publications by faculty, we could see an increase of free will publications also in social sciences, medicine and natural sciences. The multidisciplinary character of free will research was reflected in the cocitation analysis and in the term co-occurrence analysis: we found clusters/groups of cocited publications, authors and journals, and of co-occurring terms, representing philosophy as well as non-philosophical fields, such as neuroscience and physics. The corresponding analyses of sorites publications displayed a structure consisting of research themes rather than fields. All in all, both philosophers involved in this study acknowledge the validity of the various networks presented. Bibliometric mapping appears to provide an interesting tool for describing the cognitive orientation of a research field, not only in the natural and life sciences but also in philosophy, which this study shows.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Springer Netherlands, 2015. Vol. 103, nr 1, s. 47-73
Nyckelord [en]
Bibliometrics, Cocitation analysis, Free will, Mapping, Philosophy, Sorites
Nationell ämneskategori
Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskap Filosofi
Forskningsämne
biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-125556DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1535-4ISI: 000351546100003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84925496264OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-125556DiVA, id: diva2:893926
Tillgänglig från: 2016-01-13 Skapad: 2016-01-13 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-10Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextScopus

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Pagin, PeterSvedberg, Maria
Av organisationen
Filosofiska institutionen
I samma tidskrift
Scientometrics
Tvärvetenskapliga studier inom samhällsvetenskapFilosofi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 943 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf