Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Implementing healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care: a quasi-experimental cross-sectional study evaluating a team initiative
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6434-4855
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för hälso- och sjukvårdsanalys. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin. Linköpings universitet, Hälsouniversitetet. Region Östergötland, Närsjukvården i västra Östergötland, Medicinska specialistkliniken.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-5913-2903
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: BMC Health Services Research, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 15, nr 31Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Background:

Non-communicable diseases are a leading cause of death and can largely be prevented by healthy lifestyles. Health care organizations are encouraged to integrate healthy lifestyle promotion in routine care. This study evaluates the impact of a team initiative on healthy lifestyle promotion in primary care.

Methods: A quasi-experimental, cross-sectional design compared three intervention centres that had implemented lifestyle teams with three control centres that used a traditional model of care. Outcomes were defined using the RE-AIM framework: reach, the proportion of patients receiving lifestyle promotion; effectiveness, self-reported attitudes and competency among staff; adoption, proportion of staff reporting regular practice of lifestyle promotion; implementation, fidelity to the original lifestyle team protocol. Data collection methods included a patient questionnaire (n = 888), a staff questionnaire (n = 120) and structured interviews with all practice managers and, where applicable, team managers (n = 8). The chi square test and problem-driven content analysis was used to analyse the questionnaire and interview data, respectively.

Results:Reach: patients at control centres (48%, n = 211) received lifestyle promotion significantly more often compared with patients at intervention centres (41%, n = 169). Effectiveness: intervention staff was significantly more positive towards the effectiveness of lifestyle promotion, shared competency and how lifestyle promotion was prioritized at their centre. Adoption: 47% of staff at intervention centres and 58% at control centres reported that they asked patients about their lifestyle on a daily basis. Implementation: all intervention centres had implemented multi-professional teams and team managers and held regular meetings but struggled to implement in-house referral structures for lifestyle promotion, which was used consistently among staff.

Conclusions:Intervention centres did not show higher rates than control centres on reach of patients or adoption among staff at this stage. All intervention centres struggled to implement working referral structures for lifestyle promotion. Intervention centres were more positive on effectiveness outcomes, attitudes and competency among staff, however. Thus, lifestyle teams may facilitate lifestyle promotion practice in terms of increased responsiveness among staff, illustrated by positive attitudes and perceptions of shared competency. More research is needed on lifestyle promotion referral structures in primary care regarding their configuration and implementation.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
BioMed Central , 2015. Vol. 15, nr 31
Emneord [en]
Healthy lifestyle promotion; Primary care; Implementation fidelity; Coordination of care; RE-AIM framework
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-114581DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-0688-4ISI: 000348819200002PubMedID: 25608734OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-114581DiVA, id: diva2:791451
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Ostergotland County Council; Linkoping University

Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-02-27 Laget: 2015-02-26 Sist oppdatert: 2022-09-15

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(444 kB)591 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 444 kBChecksum SHA-512
ad30720a0eb9c3b414239d52ed76b411ca05107852d1ea621eeb60d44340b2470efb0066555bb6a6b07768862004703cf46b384df846ab61d242b132776a9abc
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Andersson, KristinKrevers, BarbroBendtsen, Preben
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
BMC Health Services Research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 591 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 995 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf