Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
An experiment on the effectiveness and efficiency of exploratory testing
Mälardalens högskola, Akademin för innovation, design och teknik, Inbyggda system. (IS (Embedded Systems))ORCID-id: 0000-0003-0611-2655
Blekinge Institute of Technolog.
Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Chalmers University of Technology.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2015 (engelsk)Inngår i: Journal of Empirical Software Engineering, ISSN 1382-3256, E-ISSN 1573-7616, Vol. 20, nr 3, s. 844-878Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

The exploratory testing (ET) approach is commonly applied in industry, but lacks scientific research. The scientific community needs quantitative results on the performance of ET taken from realistic experimental settings. The objective of this paper is to quantify the effectiveness and efficiency of ET vs. testing with documented test cases (test case based testing, TCT). We performed four controlled experiments where a total of 24 practitioners and 46 students performed manual functional testing using ET and TCT. We measured the number of identified defects in the 90-minute testing sessions, the detection difficulty, severity and types of the detected defects, and the number of false defect reports. The results show that ET found a significantly greater number of defects. ET also found significantly more defects of varying levels of difficulty, types and severity levels. However, the two testing approaches did not differ significantly in terms of the number of false defect reports submitted. We conclude that ET was more efficient than TCT in our experiment. ET was also more effective than TCT when detection difficulty, type of defects and severity levels are considered. The two approaches are comparable when it comes to the number of false defect reports submitted.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2015. Vol. 20, nr 3, s. 844-878
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:mdh:diva-25175DOI: 10.1007/s10664-014-9301-4ISI: 000354480800008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84929522541OAI: oai:DiVA.org:mdh-25175DiVA, id: diva2:721946
Tilgjengelig fra: 2014-06-05 Laget: 2014-06-05 Sist oppdatert: 2019-09-20bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Afzal, Wasif
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Journal of Empirical Software Engineering

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 166 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf