The pharmacokinetics of para-aminosalicylic acid and its relationship to efficacy and intoleranceVise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, ISSN 0306-5251, E-ISSN 1365-2125, Vol. 86, nr 11, s. 2123-2132Artikkel, forskningsoversikt (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]
Following its introduction as an antituberculosis agent close to 75 years ago, the use of para-aminosalicylic acid (PAS) has been limited by gastrointestinal intolerance and multiple formulations were produced in attempts to reduce its occurrence. More recently, an enteric-coated, granular, slow-release PAS formulation (PASER) was introduced and is now in wide-spread use for the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. The current PASER dosing regimen is based on recommendations derived from older studies using a variety of different PAS formulations and relegate PAS to a role as an exclusively bacteriostatic agent. However, there is ample evidence that if sufficiently high serum concentrations are reached, PAS can be bactericidal and that intolerance following once daily dosing, that aids the achievement of such concentrations, is no worse than that following intermittent daily dosing. In particular, prevention of resistance to companion drugs appears to be dependent on the size of the single dose, and hence the peak concentrations, and not on maintaining serum levels consistently above minimum inhibitory concentration. We present a narrative review of the development of PAS formulations, dosing practices, and published data regarding pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the relationship of PAS dosage to intolerance and efficacy. Our conclusions suggests that we are at present not using PAS to its maximum ability to contribute to regimen efficacy and protect companion drugs.
sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
WILEY , 2020. Vol. 86, nr 11, s. 2123-2132
Emneord [en]
efficacy, intolerance, para-aminosalicylic acid, pharmacokinetics
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-439671DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14395ISI: 000541413300001PubMedID: 32470182OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-439671DiVA, id: diva2:1542898
2021-04-092021-04-092021-04-09bibliografisk kontrollert