Digitala Vetenskapliga Arkivet

Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment in Multilingual Schools: A comparative mixed method study of teachers’ assessment beliefs and practices among language learners - CLIL and migrant students
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5009-7910
2020 (English)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This thesis presents the results from two research projects on teachers’ assessment beliefs and practices in multilingual education. Study I involved teachers of biology, history or English as a foreign language (EFL) in Swedish upper secondary Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) schools, grades 10-12, where English is used as the medium of instruction. In Study II teachers from schools with newly-arrived migrant students (NAS) grades 7 to 12 in the natural and social sciences participated. In both contexts, students are learning the language of instruction at the same time as they are expected to develop subject area knowledge why issues in relation to the role of language in assessment come to the fore. The aim is to contribute to the knowledge of an underexplored research area on subject matter assessment in multilingual schools and draw attention to the consequences varying language policies and pedagogies may have on fairness in access opportunities and validity in assessment outcomes.

In this thesis teachers’ language beliefs and practices as expressed in interviews, questionnaires and assessment samples were compared and analyzed in relation to the cognitive and linguistic requirements of language functions in syllabi and the assessment tasks. Whereas Study I was mainly qualitative in nature, involving 12 teachers, a mixed method approach was adopted in Study II where 196 teachers participated in a survey and 13 in follow-up interviews. The responses in the survey were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Thematic content analysis was used for the interview data, the assessment samples and open-ended survey questions.

The findings from the two studies indicate that although teachers state that language is not part of the assessment, they maintain that students need to use language to show proof of critical thinking and more advanced analytical skills. All teachers regardless of discipline shared the weight attached to covering course content as expressed in syllabi which points at a shared accountability culture. One of the main concerns expressed by the teachers is how to construct assignments where language does not represent a hindrance to show content knowledge. Teachers in both studies claimed to focus mainly on subject concepts, not general academic language, and the assessment beliefs and practices seemed to be closely related to the character of the subject. The non-parametric tests of association revealed that teachers with a dual language and subject content certification displayed significantly higher results in relation to all activities involving a visible language pedagogy, e.g. looking at useful sentence structures and providing model texts. Oral follow-up was used by all teachers to remedy poor written results. Although the use of the students’ strongest language is advocated in guidelines for the instruction of NAS, most teachers in Study II referred to a monolingual Swedish language norm. 

In a society where the educational discourse has become characterized by diversity, inequality and segregation, these two studies underline the need for a shared language policy and pedagogy across subjects and school contexts. They also suggest that an organization and teacher profession with an explicit responsibility for academic language is needed to provide equal access to subject content and validity and comparability in assessment in multilingual schools.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik, Stockholms universitet , 2020. , p. 328
Series
Doktorsavhandlingar från Institutionen för pedagogik och didaktik ; 65
Keywords [en]
Assessment, content and language integrated learning, CLIL, newly-arrived students, teacher beliefs, language policy, academic language, subject content, fairness, equity, validity
National Category
Pedagogy
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-183910ISBN: 978-91-7911-250-9 (print)ISBN: 978-91-7911-251-6 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-183910DiVA, id: diva2:1457241
Public defence
2020-10-02, online via Zoom, public link is available at the department web site, Stockholm, 10:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2020-09-09 Created: 2020-08-11 Last updated: 2022-02-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Assessment in Multilingual Schools: A comparative mixed method study of teachers’ assessment beliefs and practices among language learners - CLIL and migrant students(5280 kB)7252 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 5280 kBChecksum SHA-512
94ee25a4c3a317fbe9e90e7a7462fc5b2fa48e67109f46eaa4436a1e1eac88e1d32541be2d40f05223f43c2b033482abe64be76565fd23a043bd7687e8c1f10f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Errata(503 kB)102 downloads
File information
File name ERRATA01.pdfFile size 503 kBChecksum SHA-512
663c54fa828adc2833ce02d89109719305d3859dba9417151c35f7b41a510a25b01919968470c1808efbd4d1f8b3b7f192fd374dd5cdc8d91c0194b91673dc3e
Type errataMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Reierstam, Helena
By organisation
Department of Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 7258 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 9597 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf