Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The fuzzy concept of collaborative governance: A systematic review of the state of the art
2019 (English)In: Central European Journal of Public Policy, ISSN 1802-4866, E-ISSN 1802-4866, Vol. 13, no 2, p. 28-39Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article contributes to the consolidation and synthesis of scholarship on collaborative governance by expanding our knowledge of how the term is used in the academic literature and policy documents in a range of European countries. It adds value to the existing reviews of the field by conducting a systematic literature review on a corpus of over 700 article abstracts and a traditional literature review identifying five key analytical dimensions. The article also provides an exploratory analysis of grey literature hitherto outside the purview of researchers and considers the linguistic and cultural connotations that alter the meaning of the term when translated into new contexts in ten EU/EFTA countries. Findings indicate heterogeneity and fuzziness in the way the concept is used. The article argues that explicit positions with respect to five main analytical dimensions and taking into account the national connotations that the term carries across political systems would inject more clarity into the academic discourse. This, in turn, will help policymakers to make informed use of the concept, especially in multi-national policy-making arenas. © 2019 Agnes Batory et al., published by Sciendo 2019.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Warsaw: Sciendo , 2019. Vol. 13, no 2, p. 28-39
Keywords [en]
collaborative governance, participatory governance, public administration, connotation of collaboration, systematic literature review
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-41114DOI: 10.2478/cejpp-2019-0008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075185535OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hh-41114DiVA, id: diva2:1375244
Funder
EU, Horizon 2020, 726840Available from: 2019-12-04 Created: 2019-12-04 Last updated: 2020-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(273 kB)35 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 273 kBChecksum SHA-512
c1b38255000c24acfe1671a9c7a2857f51b05d5ab5b746fa9847be42e93b749fcf9eac6fbc5c91eb040a30491a8e3a1c91bc44f41f32ff737dddecd8e52bff5c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svensson, Sara
In the same journal
Central European Journal of Public Policy
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 35 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 34 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf