4748495051525350 of 1131
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Activities of environmental convention-secretariats: Laws, functions and discretions
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Ecotechnology and Suistainable Building Engineering.
2019 (English)In: Sustainability, ISSN 2071-1050, E-ISSN 2071-1050, Vol. 11, no 11, article id 3116Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Multilateral Environmental Agreements-MEAs-are indispensable legal frameworks for environmental sustainability and also define the operating rules of their implementation bodies ("Secretariats"). The contribution assesses in how far the norms defining Secretariats' functions differ and also reflect on actual functions for three MEAs, namely (1) the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora-CITES (1973), (2) the Convention on Biological Diversity-CBD (1992), and (3) the Convention on Migratory Species-CMS (1979). It does so by comparative legal interpretation of the main norms of these MEAs laying down the functions of its respective Secretariats as well as an in-depth review of academic literature about these functions. The results for these three conventions divide into nine functional areas and show an unexpectedly wide range of different functions laid down in the conventions as well as extensive variety in the discretion for many of these functional areas. Some potential explanations of these formal differences are provided. The paper further finds that actually executed functions may not be fully covered by the underlying legal norms but rather by "flexible" highest governing bodies of MEAs and concludes that occasionally an unusual legislative style was chosen, and shows potential solutions and future research directions. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
MDPI AG , 2019. Vol. 11, no 11, article id 3116
Keywords [en]
Agreement, Biodiversity, Convention, Difference, Function, Global environmental governance, Legal, Parties, Secretariat, UNEP
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-36687DOI: 10.3390/su11113116Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85067286022OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-36687DiVA, id: diva2:1336512
Available from: 2019-07-09 Created: 2019-07-09 Last updated: 2019-07-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(266 kB)0 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 266 kBChecksum SHA-512
307c127ab8f5b121b7766d0ddcf78ad41bcc75a0ab4ffe7a03998f888e21053aa22b7d39d23122f75eddc9dfec27eaab3c828fdfa17e0023c5b7d5bf2d3460a4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mauerhofer, Volker
By organisation
Department of Ecotechnology and Suistainable Building Engineering
In the same journal
Sustainability

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
4748495051525350 of 1131
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf