CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Source use and argumentation behavior in L1 and L2 writing: a within-writer comparison
Umeå University. Research Institute of Child Development and Education, University of Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 127, 1018 WS Amsterdam, The Netherlands; University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
2019 (English)In: Reading and writing, ISSN 0922-4777, E-ISSN 1573-0905, Vol. 32, no 6, p. 1635-1655Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to test whether Cummins' Linguistic Interdependence Hypothesis (LIH) might also apply to writing, by determining to what extent writers' text quality, source use and argumentation behavior are related in L1 and L2, how effective writers' behavior is and whether their L2 proficiency influenced the relations between them. To answer these questions, twenty students wrote four short argumentative source based essays each in L1 (Dutch) and four in L2 (English). A within-writer cross-linguistic comparison of their texts revealed that their L1 and L2 writing competencies appear to be related. Furthermore, writers' source use behavior differed to some extent between languages, but the strong positive correlations found between source use features suggest that in most cases this was more a person than a language effect. Similarly, for argumentation behavior, results showed some learner specific features (e.g. inclusion of titles and reference lists), but differences between languages for others (e.g. the inclusion of both arguments and counter-arguments). Effects of the different source use and argumentation features studied on text quality were limited and no clear effect of L2 proficiency on writers' behavior or their influence on text quality were found. Overall, in line with earlier research, these findings provide some additional support for Cummins' LIH and the idea that writers might have a common underlying source for writing related knowledge and practices which they can apply in multiple languages.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2019. Vol. 32, no 6, p. 1635-1655
Keywords [en]
Argumentative writing, First language, Second language, Source use behavior, Argumentation behavior
National Category
General Language Studies and Linguistics Specific Languages
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-159847DOI: 10.1007/s11145-018-9842-9ISI: 000468495200013OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-159847DiVA, id: diva2:1323080
Note

Special Issue: SI

Available from: 2019-06-11 Created: 2019-06-11 Last updated: 2019-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1187 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1187 kBChecksum SHA-512
42250b46b1e8ab88c9c1e58f243f3c2503c4ed64b6d4fe497627d94823343a96bb0c10554f90209d5b0df11a1a81f6f1cad21f08d3e597801e2070b74e9ad8f7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rijlaarsdam, Gert
By organisation
Umeå University
In the same journal
Reading and writing
General Language Studies and LinguisticsSpecific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 5 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf