CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar
Show others and affiliations
Number of Authors: 162018 (English)In: Implementation Science, ISSN 1748-5908, E-ISSN 1748-5908, Vol. 13, no 1, article id 138Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Facilitation is a promising implementation intervention, which requires theory-informed evaluation. This paper presents an exemplar of a multi-country realist process evaluation that was embedded in the first international randomised controlled trial evaluating two types of facilitation for implementing urinary continence care recommendations. We aimed to uncover what worked (and did not work), for whom, how, why and in what circumstances during the process of implementing the facilitation interventions in practice.

METHODS: This realist process evaluation included theory formulation, theory testing and refining. Data were collected in 24 care home sites across four European countries. Data were collected over four time points using multiple qualitative methods: observation (372 h), interviews with staff (n = 357), residents (n = 152), next of kin (n = 109) and other stakeholders (n = 128), supplemented by facilitator activity logs. A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process focused on realist theory refinement and testing.

RESULTS: The content and approach of the two facilitation programmes prompted variable opportunities to align and realign support with the needs and expectations of facilitators and homes. This influenced their level of confidence in fulfilling the facilitator role and ability to deliver the intervention as planned. The success of intervention implementation was largely dependent on whether sites prioritised their involvement in both the study and the facilitation programme. In contexts where the study was prioritised (including release of resources) and where managers and staff support was sustained, this prompted collective engagement (as an attitude and action). Internal facilitators' (IF) personal characteristics and abilities, including personal and formal authority, in combination with a supportive environment prompted by managers triggered the potential for learning over time. Learning over time resulted in a sense of confidence and personal growth, and enactment of the facilitation role, which resulted in practice changes.

CONCLUSION: The scale and multi-country nature of this study provided a novel context to conduct one of the few trial embedded realist-informed process evaluations. In addition to providing an explanatory account of implementation processes, a conceptual platform for future facilitation research is presented. Finally, a realist-informed process evaluation framework is outlined, which could inform future research of this nature.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current controlled trials ISRCTN11598502 .

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. Vol. 13, no 1, article id 138
Keywords [en]
Context, Facilitation, Implementation, Older people, PARIHS, Realist process evaluation, Urinary incontinence
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-28905DOI: 10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0ISI: 000450649900002PubMedID: 30442165Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85056669640OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-28905DiVA, id: diva2:1263959
Available from: 2018-11-19 Created: 2018-11-19 Last updated: 2018-12-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2220 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2220 kBChecksum SHA-512
8659ed11306f1263659cb8bb5be891ea6d64afc95bae96cb9a36b641eb4ef9156b30d0b06dc44cc10c4e0c0c771d72b59df1b75abcdcdc7ad1e0b0fe97ddd7b4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wallin, Lars
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Implementation Science
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 24 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf