Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Jämförelse av alternativa fyllnadsmaterial till konstgräsplaner
Uppsala universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Geovetenskapliga sektionen, Institutionen för geovetenskaper.
Uppsala universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Geovetenskapliga sektionen, Institutionen för geovetenskaper.
Uppsala universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Geovetenskapliga sektionen, Institutionen för geovetenskaper.
Uppsala universitet, Teknisk-naturvetenskapliga vetenskapsområdet, Geovetenskapliga sektionen, Institutionen för geovetenskaper.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2017 (svensk)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 poäng / 15 hpOppgave
Abstract [en]

The use of artificial football pitches have expanded rapidly in recent years due to its

substantial benefits over natural grass fields. Increased playing hours and decreased

maintenance costs are often cited as the main benefits, but to achieve necessary

performance rubber infill material is used. The environmental impact of this rubber infill has

been studied, the migration of rubber infill granules was determined as Swedens second

largest source of microplastic emissions (Magnusson K. et al, 2015). To circumvent the

problems caused by rubber infill, alternative infill materials has been considered as a

solution. This study aims to evaluate and compare several alternative infill materials

already present on the market. The comparison is based on ten separate criteria. To

gather the information needed for evaluation contact has been made with producers and

industry experts, coupled with GC-MS and XRF analysis of three materials included in the

comparison. The results found that at least three different alternative infill materials were

more environmentally friendly, equal in play performance and comparable economically to

EPDM rubber infill: Envirofill (Acrylic-coated sand), Safeshell (Walnut) and Geofill

(Coconut-cork mix).

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2017. , 356 s.
Serie
Självständigt arbete i miljö -och vattenteknik, 58
Emneord [sv]
Konstgräs, fyllnadsmaterial, miljö, mikroplaster, hybridgräs, fotboll, gummigranulat, envirofill, safeshell, EPDM, geofill
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323095OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-323095DiVA: diva2:1105035
Eksternt samarbeid
STUNS energi; Sportfastigheter AB
Utdanningsprogram
Master Programme in Environmental and Water Engineering
Veileder
Examiner
Tilgjengelig fra: 2017-06-09 Laget: 2017-06-02 Sist oppdatert: 2017-06-09bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(13871 kB)169 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 13871 kBChecksum SHA-512
930c3313766e3baca29c85ba6bd735616628eefac2f8cf7bdf6dc091a0f5524735bf21cbc6e409759e87e54493957caa2835ad1d63cc98cc324c87325c127da5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 169 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 283 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf