CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Regional Anaesthesia Is Associated with Shorter Postanaesthetic Care and Less Pain Than General Anaesthesia after Upper Extremity Surgery
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Anaesthesiology. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Östersund Hospital, Östersund, Sweden. (Unit of Research, Education and Development-Östersund)
2016 (English)In: Anesthesiology Research and Practice, ISSN 1687-6962, E-ISSN 1687-6970, 6308371Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: For surgery on the upper extremity, the anaesthetist often has a choice between regional anaesthesia (RA) and general anaesthesia (GA). We sought to investigate the possible differences between RA and GA after upper extremity surgery with regard to postoperative patient comfort. Methods: This is a retrospective observational study that was performed at an acute care secondary referral centre. One hundred and eighty-seven procedures involving orthopaedic surgery on the upper extremity were included. The different groups (RA and GA) were compared regarding the primary outcome variable, length of stay in Postanaesthesia Unit, and secondary outcome variables, opioid consumption and nausea treatment. Results: RA was associated with significantly shorter median length of stay (99 versus 171 minutes). In the GA group, 32% of the patients received opioid analgesics and 21% received antiemetics. In the RA group, none received opioid analgesics and 3% received antiemetics. Conclusion: In this observational study, RA was superior to GA for surgery of the upper extremity regarding Postanaesthesia Care Unit length of stay, number of doses of analgesic, and number of doses of antiemetic administered.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Hindawi Publishing Corporation, 2016. 6308371
National Category
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-130119DOI: 10.1155/2016/6308371ISI: 000389217100001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-130119DiVA: diva2:1064130
Available from: 2017-01-11 Created: 2017-01-11 Last updated: 2017-01-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1337 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1337 kBChecksum SHA-512
2b68be0c0880f0653cfb7b99ec45f416a5ecbc76158e233fd612f702492c043f3e975510d082e5ff1e4b66c4c41392e1c28f7b0c9cb58b47287874142212cfa3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, Joakim
By organisation
Anaesthesiology
In the same journal
Anesthesiology Research and Practice
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 5 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 10 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf