Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How Much Therapy Is Enough? Comparing Dose-Effect and Good-Enough Models in Two Different Settings
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande, Psykologi. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten. Uppsala University, Sweden.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande, Psykologi. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
2016 (Engelska)Ingår i: Psychotherapy, ISSN 0033-3204, E-ISSN 1939-1536, Vol. 53, nr 1, s. 130-139Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Resurstyp
Text
Abstract [en]

The Dose-Effect model holds that longer therapy leads to better outcome, although increasing treatment length will yield diminishing returns, as additional sessions lead to progressively less change in a negatively accelerating fashion. In contrast, the Good-Enough-Level (GEL) model proposes that patients, therapists, or patients-with-therapists decide on ending treatment when treatment outcome is satisfactory, meaning that patients who change faster will have shorter treatments. If true, this means that aggregating among patients with different treatment lengths would yield biased results. Most previous research has shown that symptom change rate depends on treatment length, but all of these studies used data from University counseling centers in the United States. There is a need to test if previous results hold in different settings. Two datasets from Swedish community-based primary care (n = 640) and psychiatric care (n = 284) were used. Patients made session-wise ratings on the Clinical Outcomes in Routine Evaluation-Outcome Measure (CORE-OM). Multilevel models indicated better fit for a model in which treatment length moderated symptom change rate. In the primary care sample, patients in longer treatments achieved more symptom change from pre- to posttreatment, despite having slower rate of improvement. The most important aspect of the GEL model was supported, and no evidence was found for a negatively accelerating Dose-Effect curve. Results cannot be generalized beyond about 12 sessions, due to scarcity of data for longer treatments.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
AMER PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOC, DIV PSYCHOTHERAPY , 2016. Vol. 53, nr 1, s. 130-139
Nyckelord [en]
psychotherapy; naturalistic research; outcome research; GEL model; Dose-Effect
Nationell ämneskategori
Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-126834DOI: 10.1037/pst0000039ISI: 000371345200013PubMedID: 26928273OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-126834DiVA, id: diva2:917649
Tillgänglig från: 2016-04-07 Skapad: 2016-04-05 Senast uppdaterad: 2018-01-10

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMed

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Falkenström, FredrikHolmqvist, Rolf
Av organisationen
PsykologiFilosofiska fakultetenInstitutionen för beteendevetenskap och lärande
I samma tidskrift
Psychotherapy
Medicinska och farmaceutiska grundvetenskaper

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 220 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf