Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Att prata ihop sig i rätten
Institutionen för socialt arbete, Göteborgs universitet.
2009 (Svenska)Ingår i: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 46, nr 1, s. 28-45Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Negotiating experience in the court

How do judges assess witness credibility, and how do they proceed to reach sustainable conclusions in a criminal court? This article is based on discussions in four focus groups with lay judges in Swedish district courts. In criminal court trials, a version of an event is generally reinforced if it is confirmed by witnesses. However, if their narratives are too similar, none of them is found trustworthy. The focus group participants agreed that if witnesses were suspected of having discussed their individual experiences of an event and accommodated them into a common story, their testimonies were not considered credible. While testimonies should ideally be untainted by other people’s impressions and opinions, other rules govern the truth of the court. The lay judges appreciated their deliberations, including negotiations on impressions and memories of the trial, and they sometimes adjusted their perceptions in the light of information provided by other members of the court. However, if the lay judges are viewed as witnesses of what takes place in the trial, this gives rise to a paradox: While witness negotiations on experiences are regarded as a means to construct a false or biased story, the same kind of interaction between the judges is considered necessary to establish a consensual truth of what actually happened.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Sveriges sociologförbund , 2009. Vol. 46, nr 1, s. 28-45
Nyckelord [en]
witness credibility, lay judges, testimony, court deliberations
Nationell ämneskategori
Sociologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-19671OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-19671DiVA, id: diva2:861287
Anmärkning

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Tillgänglig från: 2015-10-16 Skapad: 2015-10-16 Senast uppdaterad: 2017-12-01Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(175 kB)170 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 175 kBChecksumma SHA-512
85c9f4fa0cb22b55a890515976b85c570289df2b1130ea4d272d0cc95b2d2fd13358c6ddd147d64d0ac969447eb9385a77b29b5ad4273a7d765bef169d945195
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Övriga länkar

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
I samma tidskrift
Sociologisk forskning
Sociologi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 170 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 90 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf