Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Privat och publikt i det förmoderna samhället: Konflikter om allmännyttan i frihetstidens Sverige
Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Historiska institutionen.
Stockholms universitet, Humanistiska fakulteten, Historiska institutionen.ORCID-id: 0000-0001-6175-2909
2014 (Svenska)Ingår i: Förmoderna offentligheter: Arenor och uttryck för politisk debatt 1550–1830 / [ed] Leif Runefelt, Oskar Sjöström, Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2014, s. 57-74Kapitel i bok, del av antologi (Övrigt vetenskapligt)
Abstract [en]

This article investigates and discusses privatization and out-sourcing of various state enterprises, regarded as a political problem. The aim is to show that the contradiction between public and private organization, is not a modern phenomena, rather a question that has permeated political discourse even in pre-modern times. Theoretically, the study draws on Janet Newman and John Clarkes work on how “publicness” – defined as a consciousness about the meaning of the public – has constructed discursive chains. These chains merge conceptions of the political community, the organization of the enterprise, and values ​​of the common good. The example used in the study is the debate about the organization of the Swedish customs service in the early 1700s.

The analysis shows that the Swedish diet in 1723 was divided about the organization of the customs services. Some members of the diet thought that the customs should stay under state governance; some thought that a private entrepreneur should be engaged via a lease contract. The conflict between the two parts led to fierce debates at the diet, each side hurling arguments for their opinion. Those in favor for state service, considered the private entrepreneurs to be selfish and greedy; those arguing for a lease contract, considered the state servants to be sloppy and inefficient.

The debate about the customs service in 1723 have proven that the discursive chains, derived from Newman and Clarke, were in place also in the politics of eighteenth century Sweden. The most prominent aspect in the customs debate is the linkage of the publicness to a specific form of organization – in this example public or private. These findings have briefly been compared to previous research on Sweden in the 1600s, and the debate in 1723 thus provides examples of discursive changes, but also of continuity of the arguments given.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Lund: Nordic Academic Press, 2014. s. 57-74
Nationell ämneskategori
Historia
Forskningsämne
historia
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-105545ISBN: 978-91-87351-12-9 (tryckt)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-105545DiVA, id: diva2:729003
Projekt
Egenintresset kontra det gemensamma bästa. Politiska konflikter om organisering av allmännyttig verksamhet i Sverige, 1620–2000 (ca)
Forskningsfinansiär
Forte, Forskningsrådet för hälsa, arbetsliv och välfärdTillgänglig från: 2014-06-25 Skapad: 2014-06-25 Senast uppdaterad: 2016-12-09Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Hallenberg, MatsLinnarsson, Magnus
Av organisationen
Historiska institutionen
Historia

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

isbn
urn-nbn
Totalt: 368 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf