Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis
Norwegian University Science and Technology NTNU.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, CSELAB - Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory. Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, Interaktiva och kognitiva system.
2010 (Engelska)Ingår i: RELIABILITY ENGINEERING and SYSTEM SAFETY, ISSN 0951-8320, Vol. 95, nr 12, 1269-1275 s.Artikel i tidskrift (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Accident models and analysis methods affect what accident investigators look for, which contributory factors are found, and which recommendations are issued. This paper contrasts the Sequentially Timed Events Plotting (STEP) method and the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) for accident analysis and modelling. The main issue addressed in this paper is the comparison of the established multi-linear method STEP with the new systemic method FRAM and which new insights the latter provides for accident analysis in comparison to the former established multi-linear method. Since STEP and FRAM are based on a different understandings of the nature of accidents, the comparison of the methods focuses on what we can learn from both methods, how, when, and why to apply them. The main finding is that STEP helps to illustrate what happened, involving which actors at what time, whereas FRAM illustrates the dynamic interactions within socio-technical systems and lets the analyst understand the how and why by describing non-linear dependencies, performance conditions, variability, and their resonance across functions.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. , 2010. Vol. 95, nr 12, 1269-1275 s.
Nyckelord [en]
Performance variability, Systemic models, Non-linear models, Functional resonance, Accident analysis, Accident modelling
Nationell ämneskategori
Teknik och teknologier
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62293DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003ISI: 000283760000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-62293DiVA: diva2:372585
Tillgänglig från: 2010-11-26 Skapad: 2010-11-26 Senast uppdaterad: 2015-06-04

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltext

Personposter BETA

Woltjer, Rogier

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Woltjer, Rogier
Av organisationen
CSELAB - Cognitive Systems Engineering LaboratoryTekniska högskolanInteraktiva och kognitiva system
Teknik och teknologier

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 1752 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf