Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Upphovsrättsdirektivet: En kvalitativ innehållsanalys av debatten i media kring EU:supphovsrättsdirektiv 2016/0280(COD)
Karlstads universitet.
2019 (Svenska)Självständigt arbete på grundnivå (kandidatexamen), 10 poäng / 15 hpStudentuppsats (Examensarbete)Alternativ titel
The Copyright Directive : A Qualitative Content Analysis of the Debate in the Media About the EU Copyright Directive 2016/0280(COD) (Engelska)
Abstract [en]

The 26th of March the European Parliament voted for the directive Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Copyright in the Digital Single Market (COM/2016/0593).The directive was then voted through by the Council of Ministers on April 25th and should be implemented into each union states legislation within 24 months.

The Directive came to be very controversial and heavily debated in the media, where it has been depicted as either a threat to freedom of speech or as the salvation of copyright owners. Citizens of the Union usually have poor insight in the work of EU and media are the citizens single largest link between them and the Union. What the media reports is interesting to study by the three fundamental democratic values transparency, influence, and accountability.

This paper uses a qualitative content analysis with an inductive approach to examine the debate around the Copyright Directive and to highlight the most distinctive arguments and people in the debate in order to examine the results from a democratic perspective.

The most striking arguments in the debate is that the basic principles of copyright must be strengthened, that opponents / advocates lacks knowledge, that the Directive contributes to censorship of the internet and a link tax, and that the big internet corporations must take responsibility. Advocates are primarily copyright owners who strive for their rights to receive an income from their work, while opponents are primarily specialists in the field or internet companies who are concerned about the implications of the directive.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
2019. , s. 46
Nyckelord [en]
European Union, Copyright, Copyright Directive, Swedish Media
Nationell ämneskategori
Statsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-72639OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kau-72639DiVA, id: diva2:1326198
Ämne / kurs
Statsvetenskap
Utbildningsprogram
Politices kandidat 180 hp
Handledare
Examinatorer
Tillgänglig från: 2019-06-25 Skapad: 2019-06-17 Senast uppdaterad: 2019-06-25Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(508 kB)72 nedladdningar
Filinformation
Filnamn FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstorlek 508 kBChecksumma SHA-512
7bc1b1a14aa3978f435698031eb5eb2560048d75d5d825980dfcaf54f8889ca9478c6412c266b73907e1a767294ec78f4c66909fdf0b34ed965325f0bc86058c
Typ fulltextMimetyp application/pdf

Av organisationen
Karlstads universitet
Statsvetenskap

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 72 nedladdningar
Antalet nedladdningar är summan av nedladdningar för alla fulltexter. Det kan inkludera t.ex tidigare versioner som nu inte längre är tillgängliga.

urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

urn-nbn
Totalt: 117 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf