Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis
Norwegian University Science and Technology NTNU.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, CSELAB - Cognitive Systems Engineering Laboratory. Linköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolan. Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för datavetenskap, Interaktiva och kognitiva system.
2010 (engelsk)Inngår i: RELIABILITY ENGINEERING and SYSTEM SAFETY, ISSN 0951-8320, Vol. 95, nr 12, s. 1269-1275Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Accident models and analysis methods affect what accident investigators look for, which contributory factors are found, and which recommendations are issued. This paper contrasts the Sequentially Timed Events Plotting (STEP) method and the Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) for accident analysis and modelling. The main issue addressed in this paper is the comparison of the established multi-linear method STEP with the new systemic method FRAM and which new insights the latter provides for accident analysis in comparison to the former established multi-linear method. Since STEP and FRAM are based on a different understandings of the nature of accidents, the comparison of the methods focuses on what we can learn from both methods, how, when, and why to apply them. The main finding is that STEP helps to illustrate what happened, involving which actors at what time, whereas FRAM illustrates the dynamic interactions within socio-technical systems and lets the analyst understand the how and why by describing non-linear dependencies, performance conditions, variability, and their resonance across functions.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam. , 2010. Vol. 95, nr 12, s. 1269-1275
Emneord [en]
Performance variability, Systemic models, Non-linear models, Functional resonance, Accident analysis, Accident modelling
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-62293DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.06.003ISI: 000283760000002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-62293DiVA, id: diva2:372585
Tilgjengelig fra: 2010-11-26 Laget: 2010-11-26 Sist oppdatert: 2015-06-04

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Woltjer, Rogier
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3196 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf