Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Att prata ihop sig i rätten
Institutionen för socialt arbete, Göteborgs universitet.
2009 (svensk)Inngår i: Sociologisk forskning, ISSN 0038-0342, Vol. 46, nr 1, s. 28-45Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Negotiating experience in the court

How do judges assess witness credibility, and how do they proceed to reach sustainable conclusions in a criminal court? This article is based on discussions in four focus groups with lay judges in Swedish district courts. In criminal court trials, a version of an event is generally reinforced if it is confirmed by witnesses. However, if their narratives are too similar, none of them is found trustworthy. The focus group participants agreed that if witnesses were suspected of having discussed their individual experiences of an event and accommodated them into a common story, their testimonies were not considered credible. While testimonies should ideally be untainted by other people’s impressions and opinions, other rules govern the truth of the court. The lay judges appreciated their deliberations, including negotiations on impressions and memories of the trial, and they sometimes adjusted their perceptions in the light of information provided by other members of the court. However, if the lay judges are viewed as witnesses of what takes place in the trial, this gives rise to a paradox: While witness negotiations on experiences are regarded as a means to construct a false or biased story, the same kind of interaction between the judges is considered necessary to establish a consensual truth of what actually happened.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Sveriges sociologförbund , 2009. Vol. 46, nr 1, s. 28-45
Emneord [en]
witness credibility, lay judges, testimony, court deliberations
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-19671OAI: oai:DiVA.org:du-19671DiVA, id: diva2:861287
Merknad

Sociologisk Forsknings digitala arkiv

Tilgjengelig fra: 2015-10-16 Laget: 2015-10-16 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-01bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(175 kB)171 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 175 kBChecksum SHA-512
85c9f4fa0cb22b55a890515976b85c570289df2b1130ea4d272d0cc95b2d2fd13358c6ddd147d64d0ac969447eb9385a77b29b5ad4273a7d765bef169d945195
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Hemsida Sociologisk Forskning
I samme tidsskrift
Sociologisk forskning

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 171 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 90 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf