Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling, VITS - Laboratoriet för verksamhetsinriktad systemutveckling. Linköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakulteten.
2012 (engelsk)Inngår i: European Journal of Information Systems, ISSN 0960-085X, E-ISSN 1476-9344, Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 135-146Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Qualitative research is often associated with interpretivism, but alternatives do exist. Besides critical research and sometimes positivism, qualitative research in information systems can be performed following a paradigm of pragmatism. This paradigm is associated with action, intervention and constructive knowledge. This paper has picked out interpretivism and pragmatism as two possible and important research paradigms for qualitative research in information systems. It clarifies each paradigm in an ideal-typical fashion and then conducts a comparison revealing commonalities and differences. It is stated that a qualitative researcher must either adopt an interpretive stance aiming towards an understanding that is appreciated for being interesting; or a pragmatist stance aiming for constructive knowledge that is appreciated for being useful in action. The possibilities of combining pragmatism and interpretivism in qualitative research in information systems are analysed. A research case (conducted through action research (AR) and design research (DR)) that combines interpretivism and pragmatism is used as an illustration. It is stated in the paper that pragmatism has influenced IS research to a fairly large extent, albeit in a rather implicit way. The paradigmatic foundations are seldom known and explicated. This paper contributes to a further clarification of pragmatism as an explicit research paradigm for qualitative research in information systems. Pragmatism is considered an appropriate paradigm for AR and DR.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Palgrave Macmillan , 2012. Vol. 21, nr 2, s. 135-146
Emneord [en]
qualitative research, interpretivism, pragmatism, paradigm, information systems
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-76528DOI: 10.1057/ejis.2011.54ISI: 000301619100003OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-76528DiVA, id: diva2:515141
Tilgjengelig fra: 2012-04-12 Laget: 2012-04-11 Sist oppdatert: 2017-12-07

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(402 kB)53338 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 402 kBChecksum SHA-512
c6874f82705366c8c93ce323530626fbd7c1a4885c220b50426ba56262211fabedf980bfc8b9cbbdbd8933fe2cf419b560b0033ecfb7aec8569ba7f1d3021fbb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekst

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Goldkuhl, Göran
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
European Journal of Information Systems

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 53338 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
Totalt: 3369 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf