Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessing costs and benefits of improved soil quality management in remediation projects: A study of an urban site contaminated with PAH and metals
Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Sweden; Department of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
Swedish Geotechnical Institute, Linköping, Sweden.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2020 (engelsk)Inngår i: Science of the Total Environment, ISSN 0048-9697, E-ISSN 1879-1026, Vol. 707, artikkel-id 135582Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

Contaminants in the soil may threaten soil functions (SFs) and, in turn, hinder the delivery of ecosystem services (ES). A framework for ecological risk assessments (ERAs) within the APPLICERA - APPLICable site-specific Environmental Risk Assessment research project promotes assessments that consider other soil quality parameters than only contaminant concentrations. The developed framework is: (i) able to differentiate the effects of contamination on SFs from the effects of other soil qualities essential for soil biota; and (ii) provides a robust basis for improved soil quality management in remediation projects. This study evaluates the socio-economic consequences of remediation alternatives stemming from a Tier 1 ERA that focusses on total contaminant concentrations and soil quality standards and a detailed, site-specific Tier 3 Triad approach that is based on the APPLICERA framework. The present study demonstrates how Tier 1 and Tier 3 ERAs differ in terms of the socio-economic consequences of their remediation actions, as well as presents a novel method for the semi-quantitative assessment of on-site ES. Although the presented Tier 3 ERA is more expensive and time-consuming than the more traditional Tier 1 ERA approach, it has the potential to lower the costs of remediation actions, decrease greenhouse gas emissions, reduce other environmental impacts, and minimise socio-economic losses. Furthermore, the remediation actions stemming from the Tier 3 ERA were predicted to exert far less negative ES effects than the actions proposed based on the results of the Tier 1 ERA.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
Elsevier, 2020. Vol. 707, artikkel-id 135582
Emneord [en]
Contaminated sites, Cost-benefit analysis, Ecological risk assessment, Ecosystem services, Remediation, Soil quality
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
Biologi med ekologisk inriktning
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-79362DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135582ISI: 000507925700017PubMedID: 31776003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85075966863OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-79362DiVA, id: diva2:1391194
Forskningsfinansiär
Swedish Research Council Formas, 210-2014-87
Merknad

Funding Agencies:

Swedish Environmental Protection Agency  

Swedish Geotechnical Institute 

Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-02-03 Laget: 2020-02-03 Sist oppdatert: 2020-03-17bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMedScopus

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Larsson, Maria
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Science of the Total Environment

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 37 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf