Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Struggling with practices
Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark; Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Holbaek Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Zealand Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Univ York, England.
Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för medicin och hälsa, Avdelningen för samhällsmedicin. Linköpings universitet, Medicinska fakulteten.
Vise andre og tillknytning
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 19, artikkel-id 102Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundThe use of clinical quality registries as means for data driven improvement in healthcare seem promising. However, their use has been shown to be challenged by a number of aspects, and we suggest some may be related to poor implementation. There is a paucity of literature regarding barriers and facilitators for registry implementation, in particular aspects related to data collection and entry. We aimed to illuminate this by exploring how staff perceive the implementation process related to the registries within the field of cardiac rehabilitation in England and Denmark.MethodsA qualitative, interview-based study with staff involved in collecting and/or entering data into the two case registries (England N=12, Denmark N=12). Interviews were analysed using content analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide interviews and the interpretation of results.ResultsThe analysis identified both similarities and differences within and between the studied registries, and resulted in clarification of staffs experiences in an overarching theme: Struggling with practices and five categories; the data entry process, registry quality, resources and management support, quality improvement and the wider healthcare context. Overall, implementation received little focused attention. There was a lack of active support from management, and staff may experience a struggle of fitting use of a registry into a busy and complex everyday practice.Conclusion The study highlights factors that may be important to consider when planning and implementing a new clinical quality registry within the field of cardiac rehabilitation, and is possibly transferrable to other fields. The results may thus be useful for policy makers, administrators and managers within the field and beyond. Targeting barriers and utilizing knowledge of facilitating factors is vital in order to improve the process of registry implementation, hence helping to achieve the intended improvement of care processes and outcomes.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
BMC , 2019. Vol. 19, artikkel-id 102
Emneord [en]
Clinical quality registry; Clinical audit; Quality improvement; Implementation; Data entry; Cardiac rehabilitation
HSV kategori
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-154840DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3940-5ISI: 000458379000005PubMedID: 30728028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-154840DiVA, id: diva2:1294590
Merknad

Funding Agencies|Data and Development Support, Region Zealand; Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark; Odense University Hospital, Southern Region of Denmark; Region Zealand Health Scientific Research Foundation; Department of Medicine, Holbaek University Hospital

Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-03-07 Laget: 2019-03-07 Sist oppdatert: 2019-03-26

Open Access i DiVA

fulltext(893 kB)21 nedlastinger
Filinformasjon
Fil FULLTEXT01.pdfFilstørrelse 893 kBChecksum SHA-512
63436845acf1264880be3ec8d4e120d2ab4c350557fc8323f620da293a79bb4e785ac04b9a6d65b7ff39f91251ae483329d3c9f74246cb3d30c9cc3aa8f01123
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstPubMed

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Nilsen, Per
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
BMC Health Services Research

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Totalt: 21 nedlastinger
Antall nedlastinger er summen av alle nedlastinger av alle fulltekster. Det kan for eksempel være tidligere versjoner som er ikke lenger tilgjengelige

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 30 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf