Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vem har makten över kulturarvet? En fallstudie av urvalskriterier vid digitalisering på Kungl. Biblioteket.
University of Borås, Swedish School of Library and Information Science.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesisAlternative title
Who has the power over cultural heritage? A case study of digitization selection criteria used at Kungl. Biblioteket. (English)
Abstract [en]

This thesis is performed as a case study, and has had the aim to study who has the power over cultural heritage, by studying the digitization selection criteria at KB and what influences there can be on the digitization selection process. The theory of the arm’s length principle, (Mangset, Kunst og makt, 2013) the professional model, (Rothstein, 2010), that digitization re-shape and re-contextualize cultural heritage material, (Dahlström et al. 2013), and different concepts will influence the digitization selection process has been used in this study. A qualitative research with document study and informant interview and e-mail interview has been conducted. The documents that were studied are related to legislation documents from the responsible authorities of KB; Ministry of Culture and Ministry of Education and Research as well as the present and former internal digitization strategies at KB. Informant interviews and e-mail interviews has been performed with management and staff at KB to examine influences in the digitization selection process at KB. The empirical material was analyzed using a qualitative content analysis method. The study concluded that the digitization selection criteria is build around the commission for KB and that access and preservation are key factors to consider for KB. The study also concludes that government, KB management and KB staff all have got influence and power over cultural heritage as has the different criteria as; the material itself and copyright issues. Another conclusion was that the government rules over cultural heritage held at KB on an arm’s length distance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
University of Borås/Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS) , 2015.
Series
Masteruppsats ; 2014:13
Keywords [en]
Digitalisering, Kulturarv, Makt, Digitaliserings-urvalsprocess
Keywords [sv]
Kungl. Biblioteket, Urvalskriterier
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-18251Local ID: 2320/14737OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-18251DiVA, id: diva2:1310166
Note
Program: Masterprogram: Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, Digitala bibliotek och informationstjänsterAvailable from: 2019-04-30 Created: 2019-04-30

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(397 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 397 kBChecksum SHA-512
6e67ab73a84cabc85d798a4f5feb1e5d2ce955234c1a00ba5d9b2495cabab398addce541dd0c198c8dd585eb535c4ebdec2ad8f1520ef715c145ecf1fedbcb35
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Swedish School of Library and Information Science
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 3 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf