Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Struggling with practices
Univ Southern Denmark, Denmark; Odense Univ Hosp, Denmark; Holbaek Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Zealand Univ Hosp, Denmark.
Univ York, England.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Community Medicine. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 19, article id 102Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BackgroundThe use of clinical quality registries as means for data driven improvement in healthcare seem promising. However, their use has been shown to be challenged by a number of aspects, and we suggest some may be related to poor implementation. There is a paucity of literature regarding barriers and facilitators for registry implementation, in particular aspects related to data collection and entry. We aimed to illuminate this by exploring how staff perceive the implementation process related to the registries within the field of cardiac rehabilitation in England and Denmark.MethodsA qualitative, interview-based study with staff involved in collecting and/or entering data into the two case registries (England N=12, Denmark N=12). Interviews were analysed using content analysis. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research was used to guide interviews and the interpretation of results.ResultsThe analysis identified both similarities and differences within and between the studied registries, and resulted in clarification of staffs experiences in an overarching theme: Struggling with practices and five categories; the data entry process, registry quality, resources and management support, quality improvement and the wider healthcare context. Overall, implementation received little focused attention. There was a lack of active support from management, and staff may experience a struggle of fitting use of a registry into a busy and complex everyday practice.Conclusion The study highlights factors that may be important to consider when planning and implementing a new clinical quality registry within the field of cardiac rehabilitation, and is possibly transferrable to other fields. The results may thus be useful for policy makers, administrators and managers within the field and beyond. Targeting barriers and utilizing knowledge of facilitating factors is vital in order to improve the process of registry implementation, hence helping to achieve the intended improvement of care processes and outcomes.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMC , 2019. Vol. 19, article id 102
Keywords [en]
Clinical quality registry; Clinical audit; Quality improvement; Implementation; Data entry; Cardiac rehabilitation
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-154840DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-3940-5ISI: 000458379000005PubMedID: 30728028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-154840DiVA, id: diva2:1294590
Note

Funding Agencies|Data and Development Support, Region Zealand; Danish Knowledge Centre for Rehabilitation and Palliative Care, University of Southern Denmark; Odense University Hospital, Southern Region of Denmark; Region Zealand Health Scientific Research Foundation; Department of Medicine, Holbaek University Hospital

Available from: 2019-03-07 Created: 2019-03-07 Last updated: 2019-03-26

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(893 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 893 kBChecksum SHA-512
63436845acf1264880be3ec8d4e120d2ab4c350557fc8323f620da293a79bb4e785ac04b9a6d65b7ff39f91251ae483329d3c9f74246cb3d30c9cc3aa8f01123
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsen, Per
By organisation
Division of Community MedicineFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 21 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 30 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf